New Texas School Restraint Law does not impact HWC Training

In our reading of SB712/TEC 37.0023, the new Law does not prohibit any of the physical intervention methods or restraining holds taught by HWC (or our competitors).

The Law’s primary focus is on aversive therapies and methods and floor restraining “devices”, but it does cover some painful or dangerous physical control methods, as well. It prohibits any method creating pain with pressure points, restricts breathing, applies pressure to the neck or torso or limits the student’s ability to communicate, none of which applies to HWC.

Re: Aversive techniques or methods:

The Bill specifically prohibits aversive conditioning techniques and methods, which are used to diminish the recurrence of targeted problematic behaviors; typically by using low levels of electrical stimulation or some other unpleasant sensory stimulation in association with the targeted behavior(s).

Re: “Devices”:

The Law also prohibits the use of “devices, materials or objects” for
immobilizing all 4 extremities in a prone or supine floor holding configuration.
Note: If you are a HWC client-school and you are using our Patented “PRT® Tripod Stands™, continue using them. While it may be a device, it is not a floor-restraining or immobilizing device. It is a safety device to eliminate chest compression during a PRT in its prone holding configuration by making it easier and more comfortable to perform.

Re: Physical restraining holds (that do not restrict breathing, apply pressure etc.):

The Law does not reference:
• physical (“hands-on”) prone floor holding methods
• physical supine floor holding methods
• takedowns which may be necessary to get a student safely to the floor.

In summary, unless you are using aversive conditioning methods with your students or restraining holds that restrict breathing or have the other prohibited features, this law should have no impact on your classroom.

The above in a newsletter format.

Note: Any other reading of the law puts the law into conflict with Texas self-defense and defense of others laws.  It also runs into conflict with a school’s duty of care and duty to train for foreseeable events.  Failure to train, failure to provide a safe environment conducive to learning and abridgement of the right to defense of self and others come with their own legal (ethical and moral) ramifications.  Above is our position.  

Disclaimer: Nothing in this document is intended to create an attorney-client relationship. Nothing written or spoken constitutes legal advice and should not be used as a substitute for obtaining legal advice.

Did you enjoy this post? Subscribe now to get all of the posts!


Overview of Laws governing Restraint and Seclusion in Schools

Handle With Care has been providing training for school staff on how to manage student populations from pre-k12 since 1985.

There is generally a divide in schools between special education and general education with respect to behavior management and crisis intervention. The use of restraint in both general and special education are governed by 4 main bodies of law:

  • Self Defense Laws: Federal, Constitutional and State laws protecting the right to defend self and others.  Ingram v. Wright (SCOTUS). The State does not have the right to limit a person’s right to defend themselves or another in any manner that is reasonable.  Bowers v. DeVit. The Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS) ruled that the right to self-defense does not terminate when a teacher or student enters the schoolhouse gates. See also, Tinker v. Des Moines Ind. Community School Dist., 393 U.S. 503, 506 (1969)
  • Tort/Common Law: Courts have held that schools act in the place of parents (in loco parentis).  As such, schools have a duty to maintain a safe environment conducive to education.  Along with this doctrine comes a duty to train staff to handle foreseeable circumstances. It is foreseeable that children will lose their tempers and may engage in inappropriate behavior like fighting and throwing objects.  There is a duty to train staff how to manage these foreseeable situations in a way that maintains a safe environment conducive to education.
  • Treatment and Behavioral Plans (IEPs/BPs).  This is the duty to provide professional judgment in developing educational and treatment plans.  The Supreme Court has held that the professional duty rests exclusively with the professionals working directly with the [students]. Youngberg v. Romeo. 457 U.S. 307 (1982).

In addition to the above, special education students have the additional Federal laws that must be complied with:

  • Americans with Disability Act (ADA), Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), and the Rehabilitation Act Section 504 (504).
    • The laws specific to special needs students protect their right not to be discriminated against because of their disability, and the right to a free and appropriate public education (FAPE) which includes IEPs.

Did you enjoy this post? Subscribe now to get all of the posts!


How to Stop the School–> Prison –> Pipeline

Too many students are being diverted from school into the criminal justice system

The school-to-prison pipeline “is one of our nation’s most formidable challenges,” states the report. “It arises from low expectations; low academic achievement; incorrect referral or categorization in special education; and overly harsh discipline, including suspension, expulsion, referral to law enforcement, arrest and treatment in the juvenile justice system.” And, the report notes, “Throughout these causes runs evidence of implicitly biased discretionary decisions, which, unintentionally, bring about these results.”

What the report fails to mention is that the causes are not generally biased discretionary decisions, but policies imposed on schools by legislators, regulators and school boards.  There has been a movement across the country that takes the authority away from individual schools.  Individual schools often no longer have the authority to make discipline, safety, educational or treatment decisions as their discretion has been usurped by policy makers and people removed from the classroom.

The result, while, perhaps, unintentional, was absolutely foreseeable.

When you take the authority and ability to maintain a safe and effective educational environment away from the school and educators, and place the authority in the hands of law enforcement, there will be a rise in the number of students entering the school–> to –> prison pipeline. 

Did you enjoy this post? Subscribe now to get all of the posts!


HWC in the News: School Security Prepares to Handle Crisis Situations with Care

How to handle crisis situations with care: That is what the security team at the Monticello Central School District will soon be learning. Time Warner Cable News’ Jackson Wang has more on the training program.

MONTICELLO, N.Y. — Every day, disputes, disagreements, and conflicts are bound to develop between students in a school. While most are harmless, school officials are concerned about the few that get verbally or physically violent.

“You never can tell these days where a threat may come from,” said Tammy Mangus, Monticello School District superintendent.

To be prepared, the district will soon be training its security team on how to handle disruptive situations and prevent them from escalating.

Did you enjoy this post? Subscribe now to get all of the posts!


Restraint in School – what the law says.

The press is finally starting to report the actual law governing restraint use.   This is a breath of fresh air.  In the past the press has lied to the public reporting that many or most states have no laws on the use of restraint.  A statement which is entirely false, as every state has laws on the use of restraint either in their Constitution, case law or statute.

Handle With Care has been disseminating the law on restraint since 1999 when we presented in front of the Attorney General for the State of Virginia, the Virginia Poverty Law Center, Southern Poverty Law Center, a stream of advocate attorneys, newspaper reporters, and many other high powered persons.

Every person at our initial presentation agreed with our legal analysis.

Since that time we have disseminated the laws governing restraint to agencies and schools across the country.  To every Federal legislator and the vast majority of State Legislators.

We are very proud that unlike the press, advocates, political hacks, and unelected bureaucrats running government agencies, we stood our ground, disseminated the law, and educated schools and other organizations about the law and their rights under the law.

The article appeared in a U.K. publication – Schools Week, and was written by an attorney.  Here’s what she says:

“A member of staff may use such force as is reasonable in the circumstances to prevent a pupil from committing an offence, causing injury to a person or themselves, causing damage to property or prejudicing the maintenance of good order and discipline.”

U.S. law is the  the same.

All we can say is, it is about time the press is starting to get it right.

Restraint in school – what the law says

Did you enjoy this post? Subscribe now to get all of the posts!

Our Trainings
JULY 09 - 11, 2019
JULY 12, 2019
JULY 15 - 17, 2019
JULY 29 - 31, 2019
JULY 31 - AUG. 02, 2019
View More Trainings
A Word From You
"Handle with Care is a system that I strongly believe in. If it were up to me, it would be in every acute psychiatric facility in California."
Susan Smith